Free Adult Dating Service

  • "Enter your caption here"
  • "Enter your caption here"

Free pics kiddy porn fucks

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

"I needed a very high quality print to enter in a photography art show. I had my photograph printed at a superb printer, using a very expensive machine. I also ordered the same print through Photobucket. And yours was superior!"

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

"I needed a very high quality print to enter in a photography art show. I had my photograph printed at a superb printer, using a very expensive machine. I also ordered the same print through Photobucket. And yours was superior!"

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

"I needed a very high quality print to enter in a photography art show. I had my photograph printed at a superb printer, using a very expensive machine. I also ordered the same print through Photobucket. And yours was superior!"

free pics kiddy porn fucks

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

"I needed a very high quality print to enter in a photography art show. I had my photograph printed at a superb printer, using a very expensive machine. I also ordered the same print through Photobucket. And yours was superior!"

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

Perhaps today, when the latest news of yet another case of child abduction and murder is still fresh in the public's mind, it is optimal to release and publish this editorial. We hope this editorial will cause outrage in fathers and mothers as well as in school teachers and law enforcement.

Possibly, the information we provide here, will spark an investigation into the wide-open child pornography web sites on the Internet with headquarters in Florida that are run by a network of pedophiles with connections to Israel. These web sites, operating with impunity, are essentially feeding the sexually sick and murderous desires of people like Joseph Smith who was just arrested in Sarasota, Florida for the kidnaping and murder of 11 year old Carlie Brucia.

The disturbing information exposed here was primarily obtained from two sources. The first source was personal communications with Congresswoman Gladys Lange Highland of Venezuela by our staff writer Miroslava Flores concerning an article first published in "La Jornada" of Mexico City involving the "child sex trade" of South and Central American children to Israeli and USA pedophiles. The second source is Bruce Harris who is the Regional Director of Casa Alianza in Latin America. Casa Alianza (Covenant House) is an organization that defends children’s rights in Latin America and which has been in the forefront of exposing the Israeli/USA network of pedophiles, many in high places of society.

http://www.sammijo-model.com/images/sammi-splash.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/07.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/010.jpg
http://www.darcy-model.com/series/012.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/030.jpg
http://www.sammijo-model.com/series/022.jpg
http://www.stacystarlet.com/series/g71a.jpg
http://www.connie-model.com/series/013.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/047.jpg
http://www.sandi-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://valerie-model.com/series/026.jpg
http://www.jodie-model.com/series/034.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/06.jpg
http://www.lilamber.com/series/012.jpg

The above photographs, which are changed often, of underage girls as young as 7-year olds are among hundreds that appear on the web sites operated by WEBE WEB Corporation of Florida. WEBE WEB Corporation also owns hard core adult Internet domain names. Two of these are everysextoy.com and homefromschool.com.

Child pornography is the visual representation of minors under the age of 18 engaged in sexual activity or the visual representation of minors engaging in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer's sexual interest.

Child pornography may include actual or simulated sexual intercourse involving minors, deviant sexual acts, bestiality, masturbation, sado-masochistic abuse, or the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. In most instances, however, the mere visual depiction of a nude or partially nude minor does not rise to the level of child pornography. Thus, home movies, family pictures, and educational books depicting nude children in a realistic, non-erotic setting are protected by the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute child pornography.

Child pornography differs from pornography depicting adults in that adult pornography may only be regulated if it is obscene. In miller v. california, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography depicting adults is obscene if (1) the work, taken as a whole by an average person applying contemporary community standards, appeals to the prurient interest; (2) the work depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) the work, when taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. In contrast, child pornography can be banned without regard to whether the pornographic depictions of minors violate contemporary community standards or otherwise satisfy the Miller standard for Obscenity .

In New York v. Ferber , 458 U.S. 747, 102 S.Ct. 3348, 73 L.Ed.2d 1113 (U.S. 1982), the Supreme Court explained the rationale underlying the distinction between child pornography and adult pornography. The Court said that the government has a compelling interest in protecting minor children from Sexual Abuse and exploitation. Using the same rationale, the Supreme Court later said that even the mere possession of child pornography may be prohibited without violating the First Amendment. Osborne v. Ohio , 495 U.S. 103, 110 S.Ct. 1691, 109 L.Ed.2d 98 (U.S. 1990).

However, the Supreme Court drew the line with so-called "virtual" depictions of child pornography. In 1996 Congress passed the Child Pornography Prevention Act (CPPA), which expanded the federal prohibition on child pornography to include not only pornographic images made using actual children, but also "any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture" that "is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct." 18 U.S.C. § 2256. Civil libertarians worried that the CPPA would be applied to ban a range of sexually explicit images that appeared to depict minors but were produced by means other than using real children, such as through the use of computer-imaging technology.

"I needed a very high quality print to enter in a photography art show. I had my photograph printed at a superb printer, using a very expensive machine. I also ordered the same print through Photobucket. And yours was superior!"

Screenshot instructions:
Windows
Mac
Red Hat Linux   Ubuntu

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

All content on this website, including dictionary, thesaurus, literature, geography, and other reference data is for informational purposes only. This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.